Lefora Free Forum
Join now
Hier gesels ons in Afrikaans oor skrywers en boeke. So maklik en so lekker soos dit!
46 views

Universele litirere kritiek

Page 1
posts 1–7 of 7
superstar - member
223 posts

blyk my skrywers as spesie kom nie in baie mutasies voor nie. een ding wat almal blykbaar in gemeen het is sulke sagte, deernisvolle en kleinserige ego's. hierdie aanhaling is nogal pittig;

Joe Queenan had a great essay in last Sunday’s NYT Book Review about the glut of weakly written, gushing book reviews.

Authors are always complaining that reviewers missed the whole point of “Few Mourn the Caballero,” or took the quote about the merry leper ballerinas out of context, or overlooked the allusions to Octave Mirbeau, or didn’t mention that the author once jilted the critic after he kept begging her to go out on a double date dressed as one of the Boleyn sisters. Authors are always complaining that reviewers maliciously cited the least incandescent, least Pushkinian passages in the book, or have a grudge against them because of something that happened the night the Khmer Rouge or Joy Division broke up, or only said mean things because the author went to Exeter while the reviewer had to settle for Andover.

What makes this bellyaching so unseemly is that the vast majority of book reviews are favorable, even though the vast majority of books deserve little praise. Authors know that even if one reviewer hates a book, the next 10 will roll over like pooches and insist it’s not only incandescent but luminous, too. Reviewers tend to err on the side of caution, fearing reprisals down the road. Also, because they generally receive but a pittance for their efforts, they tend to view these assignments as a chore and write reviews that read like term papers or reworded press releases churned out by auxiliary sales reps.

ai tog, wat kan mens daarop se?

superstar - member
223 posts

hier te lande het ons in ons eie agterjaart tussen ons brothers ook maar onenigheid. voels van eenderste vere die spul skrywers

November 22, 2008
Stephen Gray vs Zakes Mda: Tiff between revered literary critics
Filed under: free state black literature, literature, zakes mda — ABRAXAS @ 12:04 pm
By Raphael Mokoena
8/10/08
The literary scene in South Africa this week has been largely dominated by the literary “brickbats” between two of the country’s greatest academics and writers, Stephen Gray and Zakes Mda. Mr. Gray published a piece in a national newspaper (Mail and Guardian) where he criticised a number of aspects of Mr. Mda’s writing. The latter responded vigorously – both of them rather strongly picking on each other with more than a hint of personal attacks.
The furore awakened what many black African people in the literary business have known for years. The genre of literary criticism does not sit too well with most of our writers, and in the end it becomes difficult to separate authentic literary criticism from personal attacks. Over the decades as African literature grew by leaps and bounds, friendships between writers had been ruptured, with resentment in the air all because of “literary criticism”
Writer and cultural activist, Aryan Kaganof has referred to “mean spiritedness” (accusing Stephen Gray of this). But the history of literary criticism over the years and centuries shows that in so many cases critics can easily be accused of this, even if this might not be their intention. Often literary criticism goes too far and it does seem as if the pertinent critic has something against the writer being “attacked”.
A case in point was the way James Joyce’s immortal masterpiece, Ulysses, was greeted by some top critics after the book was first published. The great Virginia Woolf remarked on it thus: “Ulysses is the work of a queasy undergraduate scratching his pimples”; DH Lawrence, top writer commented: “The last part of Ulysses is the most indecent, dirtiest, most obscene thing ever written. It is filthy”; literary critic, Edmund Goose said: “The author (of Ulysses) is a charlatan…the book is an anarchical production, infamous in taste, in style, everything”
As regards the “tiff” between Stephen Gray and Zakes Mda, both of them remain formidable literary activists and writers. I can not agree with the suggestion that a literary figure can only be judged on their prolificacy and having books on the shelf almost on a yearly basis. Whether Chinua Achebe published any more novels after his classic Things fall apart came out fifty years ago, he would always be revered for his pioneering masterpiece (indeed, Achebe has not published any new novel for over 20 years). Stephen Gray is ensconced as a very important critic and imaginative writer whose works have been published world-wide, with many different editions.
On his own part, despite the fact that Zakes Mda began publishing novels less than fifteen years ago, he has already proved that he’s at the top of his craft, and he has quickly joined the elite of the all time great novelists in the continent. Works of his like Heart of Redness, Madonna of Excelsior, Ways of Dying belong to the top drawer. Of course he is also a veritable academic too. He and Stephen Gray know only too well that the genre of literary criticism is often an acerbic one. But one always regrets seeing personal attacks between illustrious people (in this case, wordsmiths.)
Mr. Mokoena, a literary activist, lives in Qwaqwa.
this article first appeared on raselebeli khotseng’s black african literature blog
3 Responses to “Stephen Gray vs Zakes Mda: Tiff between revered literary critics”
1.femi leadbelly Says:
November 22nd, 2008 at 5:40 pm
the blahicans
and their
blah blah
hem and haw
whilst folks of
the continent
dig for treasure
or some measure
of
self worth..
where is
the love.
2.sarah hills Says:
November 22nd, 2008 at 6:15 pm
ms/r belly ~ you’re so right ~ and love is everywhere if you can source it, but sometimes not on this cyberpaper………. ~~~~~~~~~~
3.femi leadbelly Says:
November 22nd, 2008 at 11:11 pm
lets all co-write
our narratives
minus
all the
inter
textual
inter
racial
critique
of dem
mutha…..
elites..
amening
again
the source
of all africa,
the world.

regular - member
121 posts

Ek het juis verlede week vir my Martin Amis se "The Information" vir die gekoop om die Desembervakansie te lees. TimeOut se "1000 books to change your life" se die volgende oor "The Information": Richard Tull is a bitter man. Utterly unsuccessful as a writer, in the firm grip of a midlife crisis and unreasonable jealous of his friend and fellow author Gwyn Barry, he commits himself to a bizarre scheme: he will ruin Gwyn's reputation - he is going to 'f*ck him up'. Set in the usual Amis terrain of a grimy, sh*t-smeared, overpopulated London, this exploration of male inadequacy and frustrated ambition is very angry and very funny." Kan nie wag vir die Desembervakansie nie!

NS - Die asterisks is myne, dit is after all Sondag.

superstar - member
223 posts

nadia, 'this exploration of male inadequacy and frustrated ambition' blyk die deurslag te gee. wel, ek hoop jou 'mannehaat' word gevoed!!!
die ' is ook myne. dis verfrissend om die teenkant van misogany 'n slag raak te loop.

regular - member
121 posts

Nee wat, Abrham; geen "mannehaat" aan hierdie kant nie. Inteendeel ... :)
Maar ek sal jou op hoogte hou van Amis se siening!

superstar - member
223 posts

hoek, lyn en sinker!!!

regular - member
121 posts

Jy het my

Page 1
posts 1–7 of 7

This Topic Is Locked To Guest Posts

It's been a while since this topic was active, if you'd like to get it going again, please post as a registered member

join now